Texas has the second highest population of all states in America. Yet, if you look at the people that consistently vote, you would think that Texas has a tiny population. The proportion of voters in Texas is much lower than most of the other states in the United States. For some reason, this is not an issue to most people. However, the apathy towards government in a majority of the population is quite alarming.
When people choose not to vote, they break the American system. America's government is predicated on the idea of the government powers receiving feedback from the population through popular sovereignty. When Texans neglect their duty as citizens to vote, they choose to let higher powers go unchecked. Not only that, but the small minority that participate heavily in Texas politics have a very large influence with no responsibilities to the public whatsoever.
One argument that many Texans make is that Republican values are too entrenched for voters to feel like their votes to make a difference. What they forget is that the population of Texas is constantly changing due to migration from other states as well as other countries. This should shift the balance of power between the two parties. Voting in primaries is another way to influence the political scene, as the primaries decide important aspects of the political parties.
There are so many different obstacles to hurdle when it comes to apathy about the government. There is no quick fix. Making people care about something is never easy. While emphasizing government in public education systems is a good start, results have not been too favorable. While definitely not an ideal situation, maybe the only way to jolt the public awake from their deep sleep of apathy is for the government to something so unpopular and controversial that a major public backlash would ensue, sparking an interest in local and state government as a defense mechanism towards the government. While that may never happen, a recovery from political apathy may be nonexistent as well.
Friday, July 26, 2013
Tuesday, July 23, 2013
Who Says Politics Doesn't Have Spunk?
Eileen Smith's post on Wendy Davis discusses the recent abortion in a light that no major media source would even consider publishing. Smith attacks the subject in a heavily satirical fashion, greatly exaggerating her heroism. This is a huge contrast to the serious, stone-cold facts of most news sources. This blogger has no issues with being formal in her language, opting to write her post in the tone of a gossiping teenager. Eileen Smith makes references to mainstream media that are far from political, such as the hashtags on Twitter and a reference to the E! entertainment network. This light-hearted tone appeals to an audience of casual readers that are most likely not heavily involved with the political scene. While Smith satirically worships Wendy Davis, she does make the point that her situation is a little hypocritical, for her own life began in an unideal situation and could have easily been aborted in the present-day world. At the end, Smith does ridicule Governor Rick Perry, casting him as a wimp.
While Smith's tone and blogging style does take away from the professionalism of her article, her views generally describe the general public's views, albeit a little overemphasized. Yes, social media has turned Wendy Davis into a symbol, a hero. And yes, most Texans have quite a laugh making fun of Governor Rick Perry. However entertaining this article was, I personally do not agree with her writing style towards a serious topic like this. I understand that Smith's style is purposefully satirical and that I am buzzkill for disagreeing with a fun post like this, but I feel like this article gives off too much of an immature vibe to such a serious topic.
While Smith's tone and blogging style does take away from the professionalism of her article, her views generally describe the general public's views, albeit a little overemphasized. Yes, social media has turned Wendy Davis into a symbol, a hero. And yes, most Texans have quite a laugh making fun of Governor Rick Perry. However entertaining this article was, I personally do not agree with her writing style towards a serious topic like this. I understand that Smith's style is purposefully satirical and that I am buzzkill for disagreeing with a fun post like this, but I feel like this article gives off too much of an immature vibe to such a serious topic.
Friday, July 19, 2013
Execution 500 and Counting
Texas has always been known for high numbers of capital punishment cases. That much is known by most of the United States. What is not known is just how much of an understatement that is. While Texas is at execution #500, the next highest state is Virginia at 110. Texas has executed more people than the next 6 leading death penalty states. Yes, Texas has a very high population in the first place and a southern attitude for justice that calls for the "eye and eye" policy, but obviously, it seems like Texas is calling for the death penalty far more often than the rest of the United States. First of all, the statistics have shown that both geographical and racial factors play a role in whether or not a convicted felon is given the death sentence. Only 22 counties of Texas' 254 counties have sent convicted persons to death row. With the higher populations in Texas' large urban centers, counties in the area are more likely to send high number of people to death row. It has also been shown that in cases with white victims and/or black killers the proportion for death sentences is much higher than normal.
As mentioned in this editorial of the Dallas Morning News, if Texas is insistent on keeping the death penalty around, then steps must be taken that ensures fairness. Texas must strive for a more consistent, colorblind system. While I acknowledge this practice that has been around since the Hammurabi's code of the Babylonians and has withstood the test of time, I argue that in today's society, the death penalty may be counterproductive. There is a reason more and more states have abolished the death sentence. For one, the death penalty is so much more costly. The costs to execute a convict is significantly greater than that to keep him/her there for a life sentence. There is also the case of innocent people being executed. While this may be a rare occasion, scenarios like this are what stay in the minds of the public, causing more distrust of the government. By abolishing the death penalty, the state of Texas would be better off financially as well as fend off unnecessary blemishes to its public image.
As mentioned in this editorial of the Dallas Morning News, if Texas is insistent on keeping the death penalty around, then steps must be taken that ensures fairness. Texas must strive for a more consistent, colorblind system. While I acknowledge this practice that has been around since the Hammurabi's code of the Babylonians and has withstood the test of time, I argue that in today's society, the death penalty may be counterproductive. There is a reason more and more states have abolished the death sentence. For one, the death penalty is so much more costly. The costs to execute a convict is significantly greater than that to keep him/her there for a life sentence. There is also the case of innocent people being executed. While this may be a rare occasion, scenarios like this are what stay in the minds of the public, causing more distrust of the government. By abolishing the death penalty, the state of Texas would be better off financially as well as fend off unnecessary blemishes to its public image.
Tuesday, July 16, 2013
The Beauty Within the Arguments
Yes, it is all old news now. According to the Dallas Morning News, the Texas legislature has passed dramatic abortion restrictions in the midst of heavy controversy. The filibuster, the protests, and now the courts... the drama continues. The bill calls for four major changes: a requirement that abortion physicians decide who to admit at local hospitals, a ban of abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, restrictions on abortion medication, and a requirement that abortion facilities meet surgical center standards. The abortion battlegrounds spread far beyond Texas borders, as other states have proposed similar provisions, all of which have been met by similar backlash by members of the general public.
In the middle of all the social quarrel, people have been missing out on our government at work. The legislature passed the bill, the governor is waiting in the wings to sign the bill, and the courts will be next to make judgement. We are seeing the system of checks and balances at work here, multiple chances to correct any wrongs if necessary. Amidst all the turmoil, we are seeing the beauty of our government system, one that would make our Founding Fathers proud.
In the middle of all the social quarrel, people have been missing out on our government at work. The legislature passed the bill, the governor is waiting in the wings to sign the bill, and the courts will be next to make judgement. We are seeing the system of checks and balances at work here, multiple chances to correct any wrongs if necessary. Amidst all the turmoil, we are seeing the beauty of our government system, one that would make our Founding Fathers proud.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)